Tom Sandoval has rebuffed Ariana Madix’s plea to promote their joint house amid authorized disputes, asserting that she didn’t act “moderately and in good religion.” The couple’s ongoing battle over their $2 million Los Angeles property has taken a contentious flip, with Sandoval responding to Madix’s lawsuit with counterclaims of his personal.

In accordance to court docket paperwork obtained by Web page Six, Tom Sandoval countered Madix’s lawsuit by arguing that she failed to present ample grounds to help her claims. He additional contended that Madix didn’t take affordable steps to mitigate any damages she could have incurred and failed to act in good religion all through the method.

In response to Madix’s request for a “partition by sale” of the property, Sandoval demanded accounting and compensatory changes for any repairs or enhancements he made to improve the house’s worth. The authorized battle underscores the complexities of dividing belongings in contentious breakups, notably for high-profile {couples} like Tom Sandoval and Ariana Madix.

The lawsuit was initiated by Ariana Madix on January fifth, looking for court docket intervention to pressure Sandoval to relinquish his stake within the property. Madix, who bought the Valley Village house with Sandoval in 2019, goals to promote the property reasonably than have interaction in a co-ownership association together with her ex-partner.

The dispute over the house stems from the fallout of Sandoval’s alleged infidelity with their former “Vanderpump Guidelines” co-star Raquel Leviss. Regardless of their breakup in March 2023, Madix and Sandoval proceed to cohabit whereas navigating the authorized complexities of their shared belongings.

In a current episode of “Vanderpump Guidelines,” Sandoval disclosed monetary strains arising from their residing association, accusing Madix of neglecting to contribute to family bills for almost eight months. He detailed the monetary burden of masking mortgage funds, utilities, and different payments with out sufficient help from Madix.

Madix, nonetheless, refuted Sandoval’s claims, alleging that he provided to purchase her out of her share of the property however failed to handle her considerations about his infidelity. The continued authorized battle and discordant residing state of affairs underscore the challenges of disentangling monetary affairs and property possession within the aftermath of a breakup.

Because the authorized proceedings unfold, the dispute between Tom Sandoval and Ariana Madix serves as a cautionary story in regards to the complexities of cohabitation and shared asset possession following the dissolution of a relationship. The end result of their authorized battle will seemingly have lasting implications for each events, highlighting the necessity for cautious consideration and authorized counsel in navigating such disputes.

Shivam Kumar

Hello, I am Shivam Kumar. I am pursuing Journalism honors from the IP College. I really like the ability of writing and looking out ahead to be taught extra of it. Additionally I really like touring and experiencing new issues day-after-day….