Brandi Glanville’s authorized workforce, comprising attorneys Bryan Freedman and Mark Geragos, has vehemently rejected Andy Cohen’s assertion {that a} video he despatched to Glanville was merely a “joke.” In an announcement to Web page Six, the attorneys dismissed Andy Cohen’s clarification, labeling the incident as clear-cut sexual harassment. They emphasised that any boss who, whereas clearly intoxicated, encourages an worker to look at them have interaction in sexual exercise with one other particular person constitutes sexual harassment, no matter any claims suggesting in any other case.

Freedman and Geragos criticized NBC for allegedly granting Cohen extreme energy and immunity from accountability, suggesting that his standing as a high-profile determine throughout the community shields him from the implications of his actions. They contended that Cohen’s apology for the video additional demonstrates his consciousness of the inappropriate nature of his habits, contradicting his preliminary assertion that it was meant as a joke.

The attorneys drew parallels between Cohen’s conduct and previous situations of sexual misconduct inside NBC, invoking the case of former anchor Matt Lauer to spotlight what they understand as a sample of prioritizing income over addressing office misconduct.

Regardless of Cohen’s claims that the video was supposed as a jest, Brandi Glanville’s authorized workforce maintains that it constituted an abuse of energy, given Cohen’s place as her superior at the time. They argue that Glanville was left feeling “trapped and disgusted” by the video, emphasizing the necessity for accountability and repercussions for Cohen’s actions.

Cohen, in response to the allegations, asserted that the video was a innocent joke involving fellow Bravo persona Kate Chastain and Glanville herself. Nevertheless, Brandi Glanville’s attorneys dispute this characterization, arguing that the context of the video, coupled with Cohen’s place of authority, renders his actions inappropriate and unacceptable.

The authorized dispute between Glanville and Andy Cohen comes amidst a broader dialog surrounding office harassment and misconduct throughout the leisure business. Glanville’s attorneys have hinted at the potential of additional authorized motion, indicating their intention to carry NBC and its executives accountable for his or her dealing with of the scenario.

The controversy surrounding Cohen’s conduct underscores the significance of addressing allegations of harassment and abuse of energy within the office. As Brandi Glanville’s authorized workforce continues to pursue justice on her behalf, the case serves as a reminder of the continuing want for accountability and transparency throughout the leisure business.

On the time of publication, representatives for NBCUniversal and Andy Cohen had not responded to requests for remark. The continued dispute between Glanville and Cohen has ignited debate amongst followers and business observers, with many expressing assist for Glanville and calling for accountability for these in positions of energy. Because the authorized battle unfolds, it stays to be seen how NBC and Cohen will handle the allegations and what impression the case can have on broader conversations surrounding office harassment and accountability.

Shivam Kumar

Hello, I am Shivam Kumar. I am pursuing Journalism honors from the IP College. I like the ability of writing and looking out ahead to study extra of it. Additionally I like touring and experiencing new issues each day….